By Beaker
I don’t normally talk about contracts because we’re not always privy to details explaining a deal. However, the recent two-year, $5.5 million deal signed by Carey Price with the Montreal Canadiens left me scratching my head.
It’s a great deal for Price. He may have got what he was looking for. He’s only 23 and cashed in despite a difficult season. In two years, according to my math (carry the one…) he’ll be 25. Barely into “prime” years.
If the Habs, for their part and wisdom, were so convinced of Price (and they’ve certainly made that clear with the way they talked about him (thoroughbred anyone?) and treated Jaroslav Halak eventually trading the popular netminder), why didn’t they push for a four or five year deal? Isn’t that the trend? For teams to lock up their core players over the medium or long-term?
A two-year deal feels like a probation. “Let’s see if we still like one another then” type of feel. No?










