THIRTY YEARS AFTER U.S. OLYMPIC BOYCOTT, ATHLETES ADDRESS PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER

Thirty years after the controversial U.S. Olympic boycott of the Moscow Games, athletes who had their one and only chance at Olympic glory addressed President Jimmy Carter on his decision to boycott the Games. The responses below are excerpted from the book BOYCOTT: STOLEN DREAMS OF THE 1980 MOSCOW OLYMPIC GAMES.

“Athletes are humanitarians. We are the voice of the people and don’t have political motives. We don’t have other hidden agendas. We just want to do the best at what we can do. I think other very, very good people sacrificed a lot for this. Again, I want to footnote this by saying it is nothing compared to people who have given up their lives or risked their lives. It is a small price to pay. [But] it was the wrong direction to take. Politics and sports. If anything, you need more sports in the world and people to cross those boundaries and share what we have in common.” —Craig Beardsley, Swimming

“I read a lot of stuff about the world and see all the things Jimmy Carter has done as a humanitarian in that vein, and his intentions are noble and pure. He won a Nobel Peace Prize and he’s a good man. That’s how I feel about him. I read his book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, which I enjoyed tremendously. And I’m respectful of him certainly as a president and human being.” —Carol Blazejowski, Basketball

“I had an opportunity to say something to him when I met him in the White House. You know, I think looking at it and taking a mature approach to it, I would say ‘Doggone, why didn’t you think through the decision a little bit more and realize who you were ultimately impacting?’ It’s the same thing with the war [in Iraq].All of these families are losing loved ones. We really need to think through these decisions and the impact and whether we can ultimately achieve the political agenda that will be positive for the country. I don’t have any bitterness towards [Carter] personally. It’s more the decision and the decision-making process that led him to the boycott. I think Jimmy Carter has been a much stronger politician now and someone who has been able to make an impact in the country in a positive way much more than when he was in office. His heart was in the right place, but the decision-making process wasn’t.” —Lisa Buese, Swimming

“I believe he was doing what he thought was best for the country. Now, the fact is I don’t believe it ended up being the best solution for the country, because what he was trying to accomplish didn’t even happen. It didn’t affect [the Soviets] because we didn’t go to the Olympics. I don’t know. I don’t know what I would say to him, honestly. I think he was doing what he thought was best for the country, but he destroyed so many dreams by using the Olympics. It’s supposed to be a non-political part of the world.” —Luci Collins, Gymnastics

“I would say it was a mistake. It does not mean that we’re not Americans and we don’t understand the big decisions that are made and why they are made. It is not anti-American. I can go back and look at it historically, ret­rospectively, and say it would’ve been better to let the athletes go and ask to leave every medal back in Moscow. You trained your whole life to prove and show everyone you were the best in the world. I was up for one or two medals and I would’ve left them there, easily, in exchange for the ability to go and compete. I know those were big, hard decisions but …” —Ron Galimore, Gymnastics

“I just think he made a mistake and deprived us athletes the opportunity to participate.” —Gwen Gardner, Track and Field

“I don’t know all the political things that were involved but I probably would ask him, ‘Do you think you made the right decision? Do you think it was a mistake? And how would that have changed if we had gone? What would’ve happened differently?’ ” —Bill Hanzlik, Basketball

“I’d tell him it was a big mistake and they should’ve let us go and get our medals and then boycott by not being in the Opening and Closing ceremonies. The Russians were known to cheat anyhow. In Moscow, during the track and field, they had these big doors they used to open up when the Russians were throwing the javelin and then close them when others were throwing. So, you know, that was not good. It was a big mistake and it could’ve been done so much better.” —David Kimes, Shooting

“I don’t know what I could say. He had a very difficult job at the time. I don’t know why he thought that was the answer. Or why he thought it would get the response he wanted. Once you say it, you can’t take it back.” —Amy Koopman, Gymnastics

“I respect his decision. I think he was doing what he thought was the right thing to do. I don’t think he truly understood the scope of that problem from the athletes’ perspective. I can’t begrudge him for trying to lead the country and do what he thought was in the best interest of our country. I would guess that he would look back on it and realize it wasn’t such a great decision, but I don’t really know that for sure. It’s one of those things. In his position, he thought he was doing the best he could for the country. I wouldn’t say anything that would be bitter. It is something in the past. I know it wasn’t an individual decision on his part. He was coun­seled by several people and he made this decision thinking it was going to be an important part of the whole package of the things they were doing at the time.” —Debbie Landreth, Volleyball

“I honestly don’t know. Inside I’m still so mad that I don’t want to think about what I would say or do because it wouldn’t be appropriate. I’m a teacher and I try to preach making the right decisions. So, I really shouldn’t say.”
—Gene Mills, Wrestling

“Butt out. The U.S. government has nothing to do with the sport. They don’t support us financially. Never have and never will. He obviously wasn’t an athlete, because anyone who has ever been involved in international athletics will realize the way we’re going to bring this world together is by kids coming together to compete. As soon as the race is over, you’re making new friends. You’re meeting people from all over the world and this was supposed to be a coming together of nations, not a divide-and-separate. The Olympics are for the youth of the world to come together to play these games. If you want to beat me, you have to follow these rules and go for it. If you do, then great, congratulations, because I know you had to work really hard to do it. The thing that has always amazed me the most—we had an administration, or a guy, politician—that was supposed to see what things do to society. And follow what societal trends are doing. Didn’t he just see the hockey team win? Didn’t he just see people stopping their cars on the side of the road to cheer? The unification that that did to our country? I mean, what was he watching? How could he have missed that? And then to turn around and say, ‘Things are going really well now.’ The hostage crisis was in full swing. Our farmers couldn’t trade their corn overseas. There was all kinds of political unrest. We don’t want to feel good about anything again, so let’s not go to the Olympics. It was the most asinine thing I had ever heard of. He had no understanding of athletics and should’ve just stayed out of it.” —Glenn Mills, Swimming

“There is no ill will. He took all the information he had at the time. I’m not a big fan of being a Monday-morning quarterback. Hindsight is a wonderful thing in this world, and he had to make a tough decision which I’m sure crushed him when he had to make a stand worldwide. And those people who want to say politics should never be mixed in with sports don’t live in the real world. Politics has always been in sports. You don’t think there were politics involved when Jesse Owens had to run in 1936 in front of Adolf Hitler? There sure was. There will always be politics in sports, and I believe Jimmy Carter made the best decision he could at the time. I’m not going to sit here and say he made a bad decision. I still say maybe because Don Paige did not go to the Olympics, maybe I spared one life in Afghanistan. And, if I did, I sleep really well at night because of that. It makes me feel good and proud.” —Don Paige, Track and Field

“There are so many things that go on behind the scenes and so many conversations that we as citizens are not aware of. The trust we place in our president, we have to honor and follow his judgment. Whatever decision he made I still support to this day.” —Isiah Thomas, Basketball

“Could you rethink that one? It’s really hard because I am a firm believer in whoever is the president, regardless of whether I think every decision they make is the decision I’d make, I’m pretty supportive. I didn’t agree with it. I wish it could’ve been different. Ultimately, it didn’t accomplish what he had hoped, but I feel like he made the best decision he felt at the time. You know, it was people’s lives versus my dreams. How do you ever weigh that against one another? My response would be: Was there no other way? If not, then I take it on the chin. Ultimately, what would his other choices have been? Would we have had to send troops there? My brother and sister were in the Marine Corps. Watching the war we’re in now, I hate the thought of that. People having to risk their lives to defend us and what we believe in. So, if this was another way, to accomplish something without people losing their lives, then so be it.” —Sue Walsh, Swimming

“Anything I said to him, it wouldn’t make a difference. He’d probably still think he made the right decision. I don’t think I would have harsh words for him. I don’t think I would say anything harsh. No one has ever asked me that question before. Earlier, I would have said he made a mistake. I would probably still say, “You made a mistake.’ I don’t know. I don’t hold grudges. I’m not one of those kinds of people.”
—Linda Cornelius Waltman, Track and Field


WOTHERSPOON WILTS BUT LEGACY REMAINS IN TACT

By Alex

Before I get into Canadian speed skater Jeremy Wotherspoon, let me vent a little about an athlete’s legacy in the eyes of fans and media.

After Peyton Manning threw that pick effectively sealing the fate of the Colts, predictable commentating mayhem about his legacy ensued. Like how his 9-9 playoff record suddenly became the leitmotif in judging his career. Leading up to the Super Bowl, moreover, pundits declared that in order for Manning to be in the “pantheon of Joe Montana” he had to win a second Super Bowl.

Body of work means nothing anymore it seems. When people talk about The Rolling Stones or another rock band, they consider the entire repertoire of music and albums produced; not the one or two crappy ones made. Why should it be any different with an athlete?

So effen what Manning threw that interception? It wasn’t a choke play. It was a mistake. The Saints had been a solid, “big play” defense all year. End of story. That one play doesn’t define his career; his “legacy” as it were.

Manning is still young. He can still make the Super Bowl a couple of times. Whether he does or not, it shouldn’t detract that he’s hands down one of the greatest ever.

Which brings me to Wotherspoon. With 67 world titles under his belt, he’s considered one of the best at his craft – ever. Yet, he could never do better than a silver at the Olympics. And we won’t bring up the infamous tripping at the start line incident. Too late. I just did.

Yes, I suppose it’s easy to dismiss Wotherspoon as a “choker.” It’s an attitude Canadians are becoming increasingly accustomed too regarding their Olympians. That is, when it matters most, at the primest of prime times, we just don’t come through.

But consider what American speed skating champion Dan Jansen told CTV sports in a recent interview. In paraphrased form, he basically said Wotherpsoon didn’t need to win gold or even a medal to prove he’s arguably the greatest speed skater in his specialty ever. They know this within the skating community.

Wotherspoon earned the respect of his peers. Therein lies, in Hansen’s comments, an important distinction. For sports fans of a particular sports, the ones who dutifully follow it, things are always kept in perspective because they know about the life, times, achievements and failures of an athlete.

That he wasn’t able to bring home gold is a huge disappointment for Canada but we shouldn’t complain; imagine how he must feel.

However, for fringe sports like speed skating that are scrutinized every four years, for the population at large the Olympics is the only competition that counts; it may as well be the only one that exists. It’s not right, but it’s how things are. People are very selfish that way. The body of work is ignored or at the very least they have to be reminded. Even then, the stench of losing is hard to ignore.

It’s true athletes who excel at the world championships do indeed have their eyes on the big prize: Olympic gold. There’s no denying that.

Nevertheless, when it doesn’t happen, it’s not a reason to cast dispersion on a lifetime of successes and hard work.

It just isn’t.


STATS CORNER: OLYMPIC MEDAL COUNT TOTALS SINCE 1992

By Alex

With the Olympic games in full gear let’s have a look at some statistics.

First, I wanted to have a look at the medal count since Albertville, 1992 for selected countries.

- Germany has amassed 144 total medals – more than any country on the list. They also topped the list with 54 gold. Norway is next with 115 and 45 gold – although just two in Torino; its lowest gold output of the five Olympics – they won 13 in Salt Lake. Russia (including the Unified Team) is third with 99 medals and 42 gold.

- Long a winter power, Sweden’s production has stalled. Consider since 1992 they’ve won 31 medals with 10 gold. In two of those Olympics (Nagano and Salt Lake) they didn’t win a gold. Seven of the 10 came in Torino where the program seems to have been set back on track with 17 medals.

-Finland, another traditional power, also slowed. 41 total medals with nine gold.

-Switzerland earned 37 medals and 14 gold while Austria clocks in at 84 medals (23 gold) – fourth on the list.

-The United States 96 medals and 36.

-This is a big year for Canada. They’re predicted to win anywhere between 37 and 41 medals in Vancouver. For Canada, it’s been a steady uptick since Albertville winning 7, 13, 15, 17 and 24 medals during that time. Speaking of gradual improvements, China has seen its numbers move along the 3,3,8,8, 11 mark.Italy’s numbers have remain relatively steady.

-In the interesting fact corner, coming into the Olympics, 75 of Holland’s all-time 78 medals (96%) have come in speed skating. Now there’s a philosophy. Pick a sport, master it and reap the rewards.

Here’s how the total medals table looks:

Germany 144, Norway, 115, Russia 99, Austria 84, United States 96, Canada 76, Italy 68 (22 gold), France 42 (12 gold), Finland 41, Switzerland 37, Netherlands 36 (12 gold), China 33 (4 gold), Sweden 32, Korea 31 (17 gold), Japan 25 (8 gold),

***

Just a quick note on the calculation of countries by population to determine who are the most successful countries. I never was a fan of it. Here’s why. Countries with big populations (especially the United States) will always be penalized thus skewing the numbers against them since there are only a finite amount of medals available. I prefer to use number of athletes performing per country and dividing that number into the total number of medals available. You can break that down, if you wish, per event.

So no, as I’ve seen on the Summer tables, Bahamas is not the “best” or most “successful” sports nation.


FINALLY! CANADA WINS GOLD ON HOME SOIL

By Alex

It’s been a long time coming. In two Olympic games this country hosted; Montreal 1976 and Calgary 1988, Canada never won a gold medal on its slopes, in its rinks or tracks. Never. It was a dubious distinction to own.

That sore point has permanently been stricken from the record. Today, in Vancouver, Alexandre Bilodeau of Quebec, won the gold medal in men’s moguls. He becomes the first Canadian to ever win gold (and second since Jean-Luc Brossard in Lillehammer in 1994 to win this event) here at home.

In Montreal, Canada won 11 medals – five silver, six bronze. In Calgary, it earned two silver medals and three bronze for a total of five.

Since the 1990s, Canada’s performances at the Olympics – specifically the winter games – have steadily improved. Our medal count now reflects our stature as a winter nation.

It was certainly a great feeling to see a Canadian win a medal at home. But there’s a back story to this victory that shouldn’t be overlooked. It centers around Bilodeau’s older brother, Frederic, who has cerebral palsy. Frederic followed Alexandre to Torino and was present for the gold medal in Vancouver. I watched a segment on television revealing the remarkable special bond the brothers have.

The Olympics are about athletic excellence. However, they’re very much about the human spirit – both good and bad. In the case of Alexandre Bilodeau it’s a great, uplifting story.


IN JOY, CONFUSION AND TRAGEDY VANCOUVER WELCOMES THE WORLD

It wasn’t a good start for the Olympic Games in Vancouver. First came the expulsion of 30 athletes for doping, next in line was uncooperative weather, and most tragic of all the death of Georgian luger Nodar Kumaritashvili in a training run accident.

As if all this wasn’t enough, protestors forced a re-rout of the torch’s final relay carried by Wayne Gretzky while a technical glitz in the sparking of the cauldrun marred the flow at the conclusion of the ceremony. Seven years of hard work and preparation erased in one unfortunate moment.

Who said Canada is boring?

Now the games mush move forward. Mr. Kumaritashvili and his country of Georgia will remain in the hearts and minds of everyone involved. The technical malfunctions shouldn’t dictate the tone of the games and the protest by a few hundred people is a small price to pay in a free and democratic society. All these things are in our control when it comes to rationalizing it.

However, the weather is another matter. Hopefully it won’t have too much of a negative impact. That, as we all know, is out of our control.

Nothing in life is guaranteed. We all face challenges and obstacles in our daily lives. How we deal with them goes a long way in determining if we fail or succeed. Canada (and the world) has been confronted with challenges. This is where the human spirit will leave a mark it wishes to imprint on itself.

If my four year old daughter is any indication, it may all turn out fine. While we watched the moving moment of silence for the fallen athlete, she asked what the people were doing. My wife delicately explained to her the situation. She sat quietly and began to play a music box. “I put the music for the person who died,” she said.

***

I don’t know. Call me a purist, call me unrealistic but I just can’t get my head around the notion of pro athletes taking part in any way in the Olympics. As much as I love the hockey tournament, I may be in the minority when I write I would love to see amateur hockey players participate once again at the games.

Wayne Gretzky is indeed an iconic sports figure. No doubt about it. But really, is not an amateur athlete at its roots. He’s a professional athlete. I would have preferred to see a former Olympic champion light the final torch.

But hey. Like I said, I’m a traditionalist that way.


DRAWING INSPIRATION FROM TENNIS LEGENDS

Superstar skier Lindsey Vonn is a big fan of Roger Federer.

The darling of the U.S. Olympic team and the Sport Illustrated cover girl, however, needs to take note of a past performance from Pete Sampras in order to achieve ultimate Olympic glory.

Vonn, an avid tennis player and fan who attended Wimbledon this past year, is a strong favorite to win multiple medals at the Vancouver Games, including the signature women’s alpine event, the downhill. But Vonn revealed this week that a painful shin injury may actually prevent her from competing or, at least, ski at her gold-medal contending best.

Vonn, as seen in his NBC Olympics video gushes about tennis and Federer, but she should study back a few more years in the history of Wimbledon to draw inspiration for what will be a painful attempt at Olympic glory.

Pete Sampras also suffered from painful shin injury entering Wimbledon in 2000, where he was attempting to break Roy Emerson’s record of 12 Grand Slam men’s singles titles. Like Vonn, Sampras had fluid build-up in his shins and was in considerable pain. He was unable to practice – only hitting balls during his matches – and during off days, stayed off his feet and received treatment to try to alleviate the pain. Taking pain medication before playing his matches, Sampras went through the draw and gutted out a tough four-set win over Patrick Rafter in the final to win what was his seventh, and perhaps most courageous, Wimbledon title to break Emerson’s record.

Vonn and her fans will certainly hope she can “pull a Sampras” and win gold for the USA.


SWIMMER BUESE STROKES THROUGH WAVES OF LIFE

Posted by Alex

Lisa Buese was one of the best swimmers in the world in 1980 and a medal contender at the Moscow Olympic Games. However, her dreams of Olympic glory were dashed as the United States team boycotted the Moscow Games in response to the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan. Featured in the book BOYCOTT: STOLEN DREAMS OF THE 1980 MOSCOW OLYMPIC GAMES, ($25.95, New Chapter Press, Buese managed to overcome the disappointment of the boycott and, as profiled below from the book, found that a shiny quarter found on the floor of Boston taxi cab was worth much more than Olympic gold.

BOYCOTT: STOLEN DREAMS OF THE 1980 MOSCOW OLYMPIC GAMES, written by Tom and Jerry Carccioli, chronicles the stories of Buese and her fellow Olympic team members who trained thousands of hours for their once-in-a-lifetime chance at Olympic glory in Moscow only to become pawns in a political Cold War chess match between superpowers. The book also outlines the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that led to the boycott, efforts by some athletes to overturn to the boycott by legal means and the entire 1980 team’s eventual ceremonial gold. Former Vice President Walter F. Mondale wrote the book’s foreword.

Eleven years after Lisa Buese was denied the opportunity to swim in the 1980 Olympic Summer Games in Moscow, her resilience and her determination were to be tested in a way the 28-year-old former world-class swimmer would never have imagined.

Her life perspective had been profoundly tested by the unimaginable disappointment of 1980. Still, that paled in comparison to what happened while running along the scenic Boston paths near the Charles River. “I was living in Boston, my second year out of business school,” Buese explains. “I had done several marathons and triathlons. One day I was running outside along the Charles River and basically, what happened, to make a long story short, I ended up at Massachusetts General Hospital with an episode of sudden cardiac death.” Buese’s heart, the heart of an Olympian who, based on her times, would have undoubtedly won an Olympic medal in Moscow, had stopped. Twenty-eight-years-old and clinically dead.

“It was a an eye-opener,” says Buese matter-of-factly 16-years later. “I had never been in the hospital before. Being a very physically fit person, I had taken to running and other things to keep myself healthy and fit. Lo and behold, I had this episode of sudden cardiac death at 28 years old. I remember lying in the hospital and them asking me if I had done any drugs and I said, ‘No. No. No.’ I was extremely lucky to be living so close to the hospital and have some of the world’s leading cardiologists at the hospital I was in.

“I had a congenital condition. It was an electrical problem that caused my heart to beat incredibly fast. They said had I not been so incredibly fit I may not have survived it.I had my swimming days to thank for that, as far as taking care of my body and paying attention to it.”

Buese was born in Chicago and grew up in Louisville, Ky., two cities more known for big-shouldered athletes and thoroughbreds, not for producing world-class swimmers. At an early age, Buese’s parents got all five of their children involved in swimming. Lisa, number four in line with three older brothers and a younger sister, immediately excelled in the water. “At some point in time they realized I had a little bit of talent, and I was enjoying doing it, so they had me swimming in summer club leagues,” Buese says. “I had won a few races here and there. The next thing I knew I was swimming all year round and competing for an Amateur Athletic Union team.”

Buese’s progress stalled at age 10, so her father suggested switching back to the coach who had originally taught her to swim—Dennis Pursley. From then on, Buese’s improvement was dramatic. Like anything, Buese knew her success did not come without help and support. “My father, who was an executive and worked extremely hard, made time to get me up at 4:30 in the morning to take me to practice. My mother would do the afternoon shift while raising five kids without any help. They were committed to my success, as were my siblings.”

As Buese advanced into the 12 to 13-year-old age group, she was part of a core group of swimmers that started doing well and performing on a national level. One in particular, a girl from the Plantation Swim Team in Louisville, was also beginning to turn heads with her talent as a butterflyer—Mary T.Meagher. “We grew up across the street from each other,” remembers Buese of one of USA Swimming’s all-time greats. “We were both butterflyers. I was also a freestyler. Our coach did something unique for girls that age. We would swim morning workouts at the age of 13.I had school so I would get up at 4:30 and my father would make a bagel and take me and the rest of my carpool, including Mary T., over to the pool. We would swim morning practice. Mary T. and I would come a little bit later than everybody else and stay a little later so that we would have more room in the pool to swim one-on-one and train against each other. I think we were both complementary to each other, having that other person there to push each other to do their best.”

Around that time, Buese’s Olympic dream began to take focus. At 13 years old, she made the National Junior Olympic team and placed second. From there she competed in the 1976 nationals and was becoming a top-caliber swimmer. If she was looking for inspiration for her next step, she didn’t have to look far. “In my hometown there was a woman by the name of Camille Wright who swam in the Olympics,” Buese recalls. “There was a lot of local talent with national caliber. Then there was a group a few years older than me that were all national-caliber swimmers—a woman by the name of Robin Wright, no relation [to the actress], Rosemary Boone and a couple other swimmers.”

Buese knew the Olympics was not a pie-in-the-sky dream anymore. “A lot of it probably came from my coach,” she admits. “I think he knew I had the talent to get there, and dedication and determination. It wasn’t something I thought about every day. It was more like day-to-day and taking each season as it came. I happened to peak at the right time in 1980.”

Buese’s Olympic odyssey hit a crossroad when she was 16—one year be­fore the 1980 Olympic trials. Pursley had taken a job in nearby Ohio coaching the Cincinnati Marlins swimming club. Buese, and the rest of her teammates, contemplated what Pursley’s departure meant. At the time, Lakeside Swim Club, Buese’s training facility in Louisville, didn’t have an indoor Olympic-size pool. With Pursley headed to Cincinnati, Buese discussed the situation with her parents. “We all decided that I shouldn’t change my coach one year before the Olympic Trials,” Buese says. “One: He taught me how to swim. Two: He came back and helped turn me into an elite national swimmer. I made the conscious decision to move to Cincinnati for my junior year in high school and boarded with a family.”

The Caseys of Cincinnati became Buese’s surrogate family. They had three daughters and only one was still at home. They had nothing to do with swimming and created an ideal environment for Buese to continue training for the Olympics and to continue her junior year in high school. Eventually, other individuals Buese had trained with and gotten to know migrated to Cincinnati to train with Pursley as well. It paid off for everyone—eventually six swimmers trained by Pursley would make the 1980 team.

At the Olympic Trials, Buese needed to finish in the top three of an event to earn a spot on the Olympic team. It came down to her best event, the 100 butterfly. After spending thousands of hours swimming, working out and focusing on the moment at hand, the 17-year-old was poised and ready for the final race. Unfortunately, domestic politics forced her to wait a little longer. “At the time, Ronald Reagan was the governor of California and they always had someone like that to present the awards after each event,” Buese remembers with a laugh. “This was my last opportunity and I just remember we had to wait for Ronald Reagan to land because he was coming in his helicopter to hand out the awards at the end of the race. We had to wait for an extra half hour to begin.”

When Buese finally got to race she touched the wall and immediately turned to the scoreboard. “It was a funky scoreboard so every time someone touched, it reorganized itself,” Buese recalls. “When I touched, it actually looked like I had finished fourth, but I finished third. It was a bittersweet moment.

“Even though we knew we weren’t going to go [to Moscow], it was a goal that I wanted to make the team. I think back to my coach, Dennis Pursley, and when I had accomplished the goal of making the Olympic team. He said, ‘You’re in the top one percent of Americans in terms of accomplishments.’ ”

Buese didn’t let the boycott stop her from continuing her life and swim­ming career. She attended Stanford University on a scholarship and decided to shun thoughts of 1984 and Los Angeles. “After 1980, it was always very important to me to have balance in my life. My parents stressed that if you put too much focus into one thing you’re going to get out of whack. So, I pursued different opportunities while at Stanford. I went over to Florence, Italy, in 1984.I was over there on an academic program in the spring of 1984 before the Olympic Trials. I had consciously decided—I had spent so much of my childhood focused on swimming, not necessarily at the expense of other things, but there was a cost for everything—given the boycott and things you couldn’t control, that I had attained my goal of making the Olympic team and felt like there were other things in life to move on to.”

The bittersweet remnants of that time, though faded, still resonate when an event triggers a memory of the 17-year-old butterflyer from Louisville by way of Chicago. The first time Buese appreciated the reality of missing the 1980 Olympics was during the 1996 Summer Games in Atlanta. Buese had travelled to Georgia to visit her brother. “My niece and I went [to the Games].I remember, my coach Dennis Pursley was the U.S. swim team director and he was on deck there.That to me brought it full circle, because here was someone who taught me how to swim and helped me attain my goals and was still involved in the sport and excelling quite well as a coach and manager. Here I was, a spectator. That was the first time I ever really thought back on it.”

If that day in Atlanta brought Buese back to one of the darker times of her athletic career, surely her fateful run along the Charles River brought perspective to her life of today. In the middle of her run, Buese started to feel faint. “Like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz in the poppy fields,” she recalls with a chuckle. Buese managed to get herself to an office building with no identification and no money. With her heart racing away inside her chest, Buese explained to the security guard that she needed to get to a hospital and asked if he could lend her the cash to get there.

With $5 of the guard’s money, Buese got into a cab. “When I got in … there was a quarter on the floor of the cab. I don’t know what I was thinking but I picked it up,” Buese remembers with exasperation. “I was on the other side of the Charles River, the Cambridge side of the river, and I remember sitting at a red light thinking, ‘I’m going to die. I’m going to die.’ Luckily, he got me there and the fare was exactly $5.25.”

For Lisa Buese, a gold, silver or bronze medal from Moscow would have served as the symbol of the sacrifice and hard work of her youth. But the 25 cents she found on the floor of a Boston cab may well be the unknowing symbol of her life’s perspective and ultimate achievement.

“It didn’t dawn on me at the time, maybe because of the insular world I was in, what a huge achievement that I would hold onto my whole life,” says the 45-year-old mother about making the 1980 U.S. Olympic team. “It really was. It is something I’ll always have and no one can ever take away from me. When I’m faced with difficult situations, I know I have it in me to rise up to the challenge no matter what the challenge is.”


WHEN POLITICS CRUSH OLYMPIC DREAMS

Linda Cornelius Waltman will probably be watching the Opening Ceremonies of the Olympic Games in Vancouver next month. Like while watching all Olympic Games since 1980, she will likely feel a pit in her stomach for what she missed out on as a member of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Pentathlon Team.

Waltman, like all of her Olympic teammates, had their dreams of Olympic glory dashed as the United States team boycotted the Moscow Games in response to the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan.

Featured in the book BOYCOTT: STOLEN DREAMS OF THE 1980 MOSCOW OLYMPIC GAMES, ($25.95, New Chapter Press, www.boycott1980.com) Waltman participated in the 1980 Olympic Trials knowing that the team would not travel to Moscow, but was able to find reach an incredible level of satisfaction by earning a spot on a team that would not compete.

BOYCOTT: STOLEN DREAMS OF THE 1980 MOSCOW OLYMPIC GAMES, written by Tom and Jerry Carccioli, chronicles the stories of Waltman and her fellow Olympic team members who trained thousands of hours for their once-in-a-lifetime chance at Olympic glory in Moscow only to become pawns in a political Cold War chess match between superpowers. The book also outlines the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that led to the boycott, efforts by some athletes to overturn to the boycott by legal means and the entire 1980 team’s eventual ceremonial gold. Former Vice President Walter F. Mondale wrote the book’s foreword.

BOYCOTT can be ordered from amazon.com here.

Waltman’s profile is excerpted below.

The first thing Linda Cornelius Waltman wanted to do was call her parents. “They were not able to be at the trials,” she emotionally recalls. “I’ll always remember calling my parents—who were, basically, uneducated, poor people—and saying, ‘Your daughter made an Olympic team.’ ”

Linda Cornelius Waltman enjoyed her greatest Olympic triumph in the trials, on the track at the University of Oregon in Eugene, and not in Central Lenin Stadium in Moscow. “They gave us a dozen roses and then we took our victory lap,” Waltman recalls. “It is probably the closest feeling that I would’ve ever had to being in the Olympics, because everybody in that stadium stood up and they never stopped clapping from the time they announced you and the three of us took our victory lap. They cheered and stayed on their feet the entire time.”

The fans in Eugene lustily cheered that day because they knew, as the athletes did, that the U.S. Olympic team would not be traveling to Moscow later in the summer for the XXII Olympiad. “For me, it was a once-in-a-lifetime shot,” Waltman says.

The journey toward earning that once-in-a-lifetime started in Fort Worth, Texas. “I remember my dad coached me in high school,” she says. “He would get off of work at General Motors and we would go up to this four-lane cinder track. He grew up in a one-room schoolhouse in the Ozark Mountains. This was a man who just loved his daughter. He didn’t have a knowledge of track or a fancy camera or anything to train with. He just did what he thought was right. He went out there and put in hour after hour after hour with me.It’s amazing that I made the team.”

Waltman was from a generation of female athletes that did not enjoy today’s benefits of Title IX. Her R.L.Pascal High School didn’t even field a girl’s track team until she was an upperclassman. “Prior to that I ran on summer teams, clubs, and participated in AAU Track and Field and other club track,” Waltman remembers. “Through the efforts of several people, my father being one of them, they continued to push the Fort Worth athletic director to implement track for girls in high school.So, when I was a junior, they implemented a pilot program in five high schools to see if the girls really could run and like it.”

In 1975, Waltman’s senior year, all the high schools in the Fort Worth area offered track and field for girls. “You could do three running and two field, or two running and three field, and that was the maximum,” she recalls. “Every single meet I went to I did the maximum amount of events I could do. My specialties were the quarter-mile and long jump. My senior year I set a national high school record in the long jump at the state meet.”

Not having money to further her education following high school, a full scholarship was the only way the burgeoning pentathlete could afford to go to college. Ideally, Waltman wanted to stay close to home and compete in the Southwest Conference. “My dream was to go to the University of Texas, but no Southwest Conference school offered full scholarships for women,” Waltman explains. “So, I ended up going to the University of Nevada, Las Vegas on a full athletic scholarship.”

With the burden of having to pay tuition off her shoulders, the UNLV track coach asked Waltman about her goals. She said she wanted to make the Olympic team. Since she had competed in five events in high school, rea­soned she would become a pentathlete. Waltman enthusiastically accepted that challenge in 1976, the first step of which was learning to hurdle and throw shot put. So she embarked on learning two new disciplines to accom­pany three others—high jump, long jump and running the 800-meter.

Still wanting to return to her native Texas, Waltman decided to leave the Nevada desert. “Texas A&M said they had never offered a female athlete a full athletic scholarship, [but] they told me they wanted me,” she says. “So I ap­plied to transfer and remain on eligibility. It was approved and I transferred to A&M my sophomore year.”

At Texas A&M, Waltman not only became the first woman in school history to receive an athletic scholarship, but she was also the first female student-athlete on scholarship in the entire Southwest Conference. “A lot of it back then was you had to be real self-motivated,” Waltman says. “There was a lot of pressure, I guess, to perform well. My vision was still the Olympic team, and I got a lot of support there.”

With her style of training established from her early days working with her father, Waltman never really needed the push of a coach’s words. When she arrived on the Aggie campus, the Athletic Department had just allotted a paid position for a full-time track and field coach. The year before, the coach had been a volunteer and member of the school’s cross country team. The new coach didn’t know much, so Waltman was told to just continue her pre­vious training regime. “A lot of what I did was on natural talent,” Waltman says. “My fiancé actually ended up coaching me. I was never filmed—there was not a lot available to us back then. You had to use a lot of common sense. Basically, he coached me the year I made the Olympic team and we squeezed in workouts between school and work.”

Having graduated in 1979, Waltman needed financial help to continue her pursuit of Olympic glory. “In 1980, my husband was still in his senior year at A&M and we had to squeeze in workouts,” Waltman recalls. “Many times during the day, between classes, we were out there by ourselves. A&M supported me. The athletic director for women at the time, Kay Don, went around to the Aggie clubs all over the state and told them, ‘We have a girl who wants to make the Olympic team and we have to support her.’ She actu­ally got donations from Aggie clubs that went into a fund, and she created a checking account that funded my training and travel for the year so that I could commit most of my time to working out.”

But then came the boycott. Waltman’s “happily-ever-after” ending to her Olympic story concluded in Eugene, Ore., as she circled the track in the victory of realizing her dream. The 1980 Olympic Summer Games in Moscow would have been her only chance to test herself at the highest level of competition. Her husband had been accepted to law school in Lubbock, Texas, and they were moving on with their lives. “For me,” Waltman says, “that was the one chance I had. One of us had to go to work, so I started teaching and coaching.”

After moving to Lubbock, she tried to regain the spirit that carried her to work toward Moscow. Unfortunately, the 23-year-old couldn’t muster the energy to train and sacrifice four more years. “I remember that Fall thinking I would start training again. I was running and trying to do some things, but I could never get it back. There was a sadness, and I just couldn’t get that high again that soon. For me it was the end of my athletic career, and I moved on with my life.”

Waltman has since been inducted into the Texas A&M Hall of Fame, and now works as the superintendent for Public Parks and Recreation in Boerne, Texas, and has served as commissioner of the Texas Amateur Athletic Federa­tion for the past 23 years.

Despite the loss of a dream, Waltman contends that losing the chance to compete in the Olympics has not been the biggest disappointment of her life. “As you become a mature person and lose friends to illness, those are things that are big disappointments,” she says. “Has it been a big disappointment? It’s up there. I had never made an Olympic team. Several of the others had made several Olympic teams prior to ’80, and they knew what it was all about. I don’t know that I had that understanding at the time. I have since gotten that understanding of all the things that I’ve missed, and it angers me. I’m very angry because it shouldn’t have happened.”

Waltman, a mother of four, ponders her missed opportunity each time the world gathers to celebrate youth and sport every four winters and summers. “I don’t think I’ve ever watched a Winter or Summer Olympic Games, and seen the American team march in, that I don’t think about missing out on that. Every time,” she says. “It never feels any better. It’s really not about what you do at the Olympics. It’s being a part of the Olympics.You’ve heard that statement before and it really is true. That is something you shouldn’t take away from an athlete who’s given so much and worked really hard.”

Though she doesn’t dwell on it, the ultimate sadness that resides in the recesses of her soul reappears when she’s reminded about her experience in 1980.“I don’t feel like one of the lucky ones, that’s for sure. It’s just sad. It’s being unique without really wanting that uniqueness.”

In the end, though, she is proud. Proud to have accomplished a goal that, by today’s standards, is probably unachievable in the way Waltman pursued it. “My parents were both working-class folks. They did not have high school degrees, and they worked in factories. I just really wanted to do well to bring honor to them. Along the way, that became very important to me. I wanted to do something with my life, and I knew my route was going to be through athletics. That’s why I pursued that vision of a scholarship with the next thing on the list being the Olympics. That is the ultimate—to make the Olympic team.”


HOCKEY GOLD IS NOT THE ONLY PATH TO OLYMPIC SUCCESS FOR CANADA

By Beaker

With the Olympics right around the corner, I’ve heard it be asked “will the Olympics be a failure of Canada doesn’t win a gold in men’s hockey?”

In a land where hockey reigns supreme and runs paramount to anything athletic, I can see the temptation to ponder such a myopic question.

The answer clearly is no.

If Canada wins one gold and it happens to be in hockey, this won’t mean the Olympics were a success especially considering the ‘Own the Podium’  program in place.  Conversely, if Canada surpasses all expectations and wins, say, 11 gold medals and 35 medals, but no gold in hockey (let’s assume silver), how can it be asserted with any seriousness this wouldn’t be a success?

The Olympics are about many sports and not just one. Hockey is just a part of this equation; not above it.

In any event, I’m of the opinion professionals shouldn’t even be participating in a sporting event meant to be for amateurs. In fact, I would love to see amateur hockey players one day compete again.

.


BOBSLED RUNNER GILLIAN COOKE REVEALS BACKDOOR

Whoever said that bobsled isn’t sexy enough was wrong. In fact, everything about bobsled is hot & sexy.  I never saw any female bobsled runner who wasn’t sexy or unrevealing. Yah them suits are so tight that you can actually view anything and everything.  I love watching bobsled and I hope to see many women in a bobsled tight outfit in Vancouver 2010.

For now, I’ll spoil you with a nice video of Gillian Cooke.