Sports Tidbits: The Great Jimmy Johnson, Forrest, Hesjedal And Massa

- The ride continues of former athletes losing their lives through violent acts. Boxing in particular lost three within a month – Alexis Arguello, Arturo Gatti and now former welterweight and light middleweight championVernon Forrest who was murdered in Atlanta.Add New Post ‹ Intersportswire — WordPress

-Three cheers – or four. I don’t care – for Ryder Hesjedal of Canada who finished 49th overall at the Tour de France. Just as impressivley he was a top three rider for Team Garmin-Slipstream behind teammates British rider Bradley Wiggins who finished fourth overall and eight place finisher American Christian Vande Velde. Steve Bauer’s fourth place finish in 1988 is still the benchmark for Canadian riders. Bauer wore the yellow jersey for five days that year. Alex Steida became the first Canadian to ever wear the coveted jersey in 1986. He was the first North American to ever do so.

-Ferrari driver Felipe Massa is now in stable condition. It’s been a tough year for Ferrari. But Michael Schumacher has agreed to replace Massa until he’s ready to race again – which won’t be this year. Should be interesting but it’s hard to think he can turn Ferrari’s season around.

20207420 240X180 Sports Tidbits: The Great Jimmy Johnson, Forrest, Hesjedal And Massa-When it came to the art of defense, Philadelphia Eagles defensive coordinator Jimmy Johnson was its master. He was the essence and foundation of an Eagles defense revered across the NFL. Johnson was fighting cancer for a while but his passing still comes as a shock to not just the Eagles and their supporters but all football (and sports in general) fans. A tribute to JJ here. RIP.

The best way to honor his life is for the Eagles to go out and win that damn elusive Super Bowl!

-My nephew, who really could care less when it comes to sport, made an interesting comment. He said that sports on TV is the ultimate reality show as opposed to all that scriped crap we see.


Healthy Skepticism In Sports Valid

By Sal Marinello

Health and Fitness Advice

World record performance in the 100-meter dash and climbing hills in the Tour de France are related and may be a starting point to design a better way to detect performance.

It’s become commonplace to hear accounts of world-class sprinters covering a 100-meter course in 9.9 seconds; 9.9 or faster has been run 96 times over the past 2 decades.  Take one-tenth of a second off this time, run a 9.8, and it’s only been done 16 times by four different guys; Maurice Greene (twice), Asafa Powell (seven), Usain Bolt (five) and Tyson Gay (twice).

ben johnson si Healthy Skepticism In Sports Valid

Johnson: He wasn't the only one.

Back in the late 1980s when Ben Johnson ran the first sub 9.8-second 100-meters, he knocked almost two-tenths of a second off the existing record and won the Gold Medal in the Seoul Olympics’ 100-meter final (he ran a 9.79).  Turned out he was fueled by Stanozolol and stripped of his Olympic title.  Since then, Justin Gatlin and Tim Montgomery have run similar times and held the World Record and also have had their times nullified due to failed drug tests.

Testimony provided as a result of the BALCO scandal by mastermind Victor Conte, track coaches and track athletes revealed a glimpse of the performance parameters of the world’s fastest men. The prevailing wisdom was that doping was necessary in order to run world-record neighborhood times.  Conte has been steadfast in his belief that track and field athletes, and sprinters in particular, owe their success to a steady diet of performance-enhancing drugs (PED).

Without even getting into women sprinters, and what we know about outstanding performances among baseball players and how drugs played a major role, there are more than enough reasons for people to be skeptical of outstanding athletic performances.

Now I’m going to shift gears and talk cycling.

While it’s not a major sport, cycling has developed a cult following in the United States and in many nations across the world.  Cycling is a sport that has been rife with doping, and was the first sport to really delve into the high-tech areas of performance-enhancing drug use and extraordinary medical interventions.  Even for an iconic figure like Lance Armstrong, the specter of PED use both follows and overshadows all that he, and other cycling champions, has accomplished.

PED use has so tainted the sport of cycling that this year’s winner – Alberto Contador – had yet to take his perfunctory victory ride in the final stage of the Tour when former Tour winner Greg LeMond questioned the issue of the “cleanliness” of his performance.

LeMond opined in the French newspaper “LeMonde” that, “What is one to make of Contador’s record setting speed on the climb to Verbier? According to Antoine Vayer (My Note: Former cycling insider and anti-doping advocate) and his recently published calculations he would need a VO2 max of 99.5 ml to do this effort. As far as I know, this is a number which (sic) has never been recorded by any athlete in any sport. This value corresponds to the oxygen needs required of many recent Tour de France winners’ performances in mountain stages and time trials. This is like a gorgeous Mercedes sedan from the showroom showing up for an F1 race and being competitive or winning. It just doesn’t add up, show me what is really under the hood.”

To put the climb performance in perspective, Contador covered 5.3 miles (8.5 km) with an average slope of 7.5% in a hair under 21-minutes, which means he averaged over 18.5 miles per hour (30 kmph) up a series of steep hairpin turns.

Much of the discussion that has come about as a result of LeMond’s column, the majority of which is in cycling circles, involves questioning the motives of Antoine Vayer and the math behind his methods.  Matters of VO2 Max, efficiency, power output and the like are way beyond the attention and interest spans of the vast majority of sports fans, but they do serve as a jumping off point for the discussion that Greg LeMond has started.

Calculations and formulas aside, LeMond is on the right track when he brings up the notion of questioning outstanding performances that greatly overshadow current and historical norms.  LeMond is not some desk jockey sniping away at real athletes without the benefit of knowing what it’s like to be the best in the race.  He is a Tour de France champion.  He knows when something just doesn’t look right.

Critics of the LeMond/Vayer school of thought, that power output calculations can be an indication of doping, have questioned Vayer’s calculations based on Contador’s 2009 Tour performance.  However, Vayer published a piece earlier this summer in which he details his 3-point plan.

* Verified Doping (410 watts): Covering more than 400 meters at a world-champion level of athleticism, without getting tired and after five hours of effort
* Miraculous Doping (430 watts): Raising your leg by one meter, with 45 kilos [= 99 lb.] attached to it, more than 2000 times without faltering, after five hours of effort
* Mutant Doping (450 watts): Riding a bike at 10 km/hour up a slope of 10% steepness (which does not exist in France) while towing a cargo of 100 kilos [= 220 lb.], after five hours of effort

To understand the energy output required to reach the 410 watt level, the 400-meters would have to be covered at a rate of 9.7 seconds per 100-meters, or the world’s fastest 100-meter run, run four times after 5 hours of effort.  Now you know why I started out talking sprinting.

Vayer also provides some context to this issue of the production of power. ”Since the beginning of the 1990s, the products or methods which oxygenate blood, combined with all the other toxic medications described ever more fully by former “champions,” have permitted [race] leaders to produce on their two wheels an amount of power, expressed in watts, almost double that of a donkey of the beginning of the century pulling a load (250 watts), and equal to that of a steam-engine before the invention of mechanical propulsion.”

The LeMond/Vayer position is a valid one, in that there are limits to human performance even among elites, and that extraordinary performances can be indications of PED use.  Once you accept this position – that there is just so much work a human can do – details with regards to the calculations and formulas can be hammered out. Just as we know that baseball or football players cannot continue to add noticeable amounts of lean muscle mass, naturally, as they age, the amount of power a human can produce is finite and knowable within reason.

Athletes themselves have given us the reasons to question great performances and cannot blame anyone but themselves for the heightened sense of skepticism that exists among fans and journalists.


LeMond Careless With Accusations

By pelotonjim

Bitter at anyone who shows greatness, Greg LeMond seethes bitterness at his new target, Alberto Contador. Looking at the final climb of Mt. Verbier.

“Never has a rider in the Tour climbed so fast.”

alberto contador 1448493c LeMond Careless With Accusations

Not being treated fairly?

Where does he get his opinion?  LeMond takes some postulations from Antoine Vayer, former Festina Trainer.  The face that Vayer clearly states that he makes a significant number of assumptions in his calculations  did not sway the former Tour Champ.

“Contador would have needed a VO2 max  of 99.5 ml/mn/kg to produce such an effort. To my knowledge this figure has never been achieved by any athlete in any sport. It is a bit like if you took a nice Mercedes out of the car showroom, lined it up on a Formula 1 circuit and won the race. There is something that is wrong. It would be interesting to know what is under the bonnet.”

The Science of Sport outlines these assumptions (including a big assumption of a 490 watt output) and how any conclusions made from watching TV are not worth the paper they are written on.  From article:

  • Last week, we looked at Contador’s climbing rate (VAMs) and using Michele Ferrari’s formula, arrive at a power output of 6.78 W/kg, or 420W.
  • Alex Simmons very kindly provided some calculations for the climb, given the speed and gradient, and he arrived at a value of 422 W. He went on to show that if you assume even a small following wind, this power output drops to 397W.
  • Using the same principles, but making more “aggressive” assumptions, I have calculated the power output at around 440 W - this is an upper end, call it the “worst case scenario”, because I think Alex has pretty much arrived at the accurate figures using his equations (which match the estimation of the Ferrari equations based on VAMs)
  • Given the seriousness of doping allegations, you better be damn sure of your facts Mr. LeMond.  You are the first to sue based on baseless allegations.  You of all people should understand the damage you can do by lobbing these type of grenades.


    Dallas Cowboys Aren’t ‘The Best Sports Franchise In The World’

    By Beaker

    I heard Michael Irving say on “4th and Long” that the Dallas Cowboys were the “best team in all off professional sports around the world.”

    Meh.

    I’m not even sure if they’re the best in the NFL. I mean, what, the Green Bay Packers and Pittsburgh Steelers are chopped bladder?

    When one ponders his comment further, the less it holds fresh water.

    If it’s debatable in the NFL how can it extend to other sports? Baseball has the New York Yankees. Let’s throw the Los Angeles Dodgers and St. Louis Cardinals in the mix for fun. Hockey has the Montreal Canadiens – and more recently the Detroit Red Wings. If you’re in a good mood, and I mean you have to be essentially drunk, you can add the Toronto Maple Leafs. Basketball has the Boston Celtics and Los Angeles Lakers. Can it be claimed the Cowboys are bigger than all these franchises in terms of dominance and titles?

    I could have digested “best in North America” but the former WR had to go all Texan and claim “best in the world.”

    To anyone who follows soccer, there are many great European sides with legendary status. Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich, Liverpool, Manchester United, Ajax, Inter Milan, AC Milan and Juventus immediately spring to mind.

    Again, are the Cowboys bigger than these teams? I’m willing to go out on a limb and say…what’s the word…nope.


    Post-Joe Calzaghe, Six Super Middleweights Stake Their Claim

    Originally posted on FightInsight.com.

    Just like his compatriot Lennox Lewis, Joe Calzaghe left no doubt as to who the alpha male in his division was. Largely defined by his thrashing of then-undefeated Jeff Lacey as well as his dominant victory over then-undefeated Mikkel Kessler, “the Pride of Wales” ruled the 168-pound division with an iron fist, never losing a fight.

    I believe that a prime Roy Jones, Jr. was the best boxer to ever fight at super middleweight, but it’s very hard to argue that any 168 pounder accomplished more than Calzaghe. That’s the burden that Andre Dirrell (18-0, 13 KOs), Andre Ward (19-0, 12 KOs), Arthur Abraham (30-0, 24 KOs), Carl Froch (25-0, 20 KOs), Jermain Taylor (28-3-1, 17 KOs) and Mikkel Kessler (41-1, 31 KOs) all carry as they participate in the six-boxer tournament being dubbed the Super Six.

    These fighters are all very close in skill, so it’s hard to say that there’s a clear favorite. If I were forced to pick a winner, my money would be on Andre Dirrell. I know he does not have the big fight experience that the others have, but he has arguably the best combination of power and speed of the bunch. Maybe I’m crazy. But he’s my pick, and here’s why:

    1. Andre Ward. He’s a very quick and skillful fighter, but I think he can be too defensive at times. This will inevitably cost him as most of his fights will likely go the distance. He also appears to be the least powerful (punching) of the group.
    2. Arthur Abraham. Although Abraham is arguably the best middleweight in the world, I feel that the move up in weight will diminish his power, as he’ll be fighting fighters who are naturally bigger than him.
    3. Carl Froch. The “Cobra” is tough-as-nails and packs a wallop. However, all that glitters is not gold. He may be the most colorful outside the ring, but he’s probably the least skilled of the sextet.
    4. Jermain Taylor. “Bad Intentions” is definitely the most battle-tested, but that’s also part of his problem. I am not sure how much he has left in the tank after his wars with Bernard Hopkins, Kelly Pavlik and Carl Froch. And he still seems to fade in the last rounds of all of his major fights.
    5. Mikkel Kessler. If this tournament was created about two years ago, he’d be my pick. However, it’s not. In those two years since his lone defeat at the hands of the aforementioned Calzaghe, he’s only fought two times. And against Dimitri Sartison and Danilo Haussler. That’s not exactly what I call great preparation for this tournament.

    Sports Illustrated recently asked if this super middleweight tourney can change the business of boxing? I don’t know about all of that but I do know that the winner will emerge as the clear king of the super middleweights, rendering all alphabelt nonsense null and void. Now only if college football and the B.S., ahem, B.C.S. took note. But that’s a post for another sport and another day. Let’s just marinate on this good news.


    Watershed Moment For Michael Owen At Manchester United

    By Soccernet

    Who would have thought Michael Owen will be training at Old Trafford? Even though it has been a week since the official transfer was announced, the debate on his suitability rages on, at times emotionally charged with disbelief, vitriol and ridicule.

    After trading in the “world’s best player” and then signing an over-the-hill striker whose panache has been eroded by a stint at Newcastle and long term injuries, is Alex Ferguson running out of options already? Maybe Ferguson is not desperate but rather, the 32 page glossy brochure depicting Owen as a charismatic, cool, good-looking, articulate, clean, fresh, fit and healthy player have worked its wonders on him.

    We will never know but from a financial perspective, this roll of the dice by Alex Ferguson presents mutual benefits and little risks. Manchester United secured Michael Owen’s service on a free transfer and will pay him a low basic salary of about £20,000 a week, with massive performance-related bonuses which could take him close to £110,000 a week. Compared to previous costly errors in the transfer market, this is a shrewd investment by a long mile.

    For the player, he gets a taste of Champions League football (instead of fighting relegation battles with Hull and Stoke) and a chance to add Premier League titles to his career highlights. The top-notch training facilities, medical team and lower expectations from Manchester United fans will also provide a conducive environment to resurrect his flagging career, just in time for the World Cup next year.

    David Beckham has shown that money is secondary, provided he can fulfill his dreams of playing for a prestigious European club and representing England in the World Cup again. He willingly accepted paycuts in AC Milan and virtually paid out of pocket to settle terms with LA Galaxy. Fabio Capello was rightfully impressed with his determination and there is no reason why he should not give Owen a fair chance if the latter rediscovers his lethal scoring instincts.

    Currently, shirt sales attributed to Michael Owen are stagnant, which means that Manchester United fans have yet to warm up to this former stalwart of arch rival, Liverpool. It will take several match-winning performances for Michael Owen to prove his mettle, win over the skepticism of the fans and vindicate Alex Ferguson’s judgment.

    michael owen Watershed Moment For Michael Owen At Manchester United

    Michael Owen

    However, even if the club has to contend with a non-performing Owen, the financial losses can be written off easily. Of paramount concern is the dearth of quality reinforcements which could hinder their title campaign next season. With Manchester United’s massive debts, not winning trophies and being forsaken by football fans is a recipe for financial disaster.

    In Europe, challenging the likes of Barcelona which handily defeated them in the Champions League and the awe-inspiring Galaticos II of Real Madrid is becoming an uphill battle. On the domestic front, Liverpool and Chelsea breathed down Manchester United’s neck in the closing stages and if not for their inconsistencies which proved insurmountable, the Premier League race could have a different outcome.

    Indeed, Manchester United should be beefing up or at least retaining its core assets but they were forced to sell Cristiano Ronaldo, their most reliable source of goals, to Real Madrid. Carlos Tevez is also set for a move to Manchester City or Chelsea, further reducing United’s front line options.

    In fairness, Ronaldo has been clamoring for an exit for some time and Alex Ferguson has done his best to extract much value from the Portuguese. Keeping him for another season will only result in a disgruntled player with diminishing returns on the pitch and lower market value as well as disruption to team spirit.

    Unlike Arsene Wenger who confessed that his transfer budget is not as generous as reported and Liverpool’s financial quagmire as highlighted by KPMG, Manchester United are flush with cash (from Ronaldo’s sale) and they still maintain a winning touch as domestic champions and consistently deliver in Europe, yet world class talents are reluctant to bite the bait.

    Karim Benzema, one of the fans’ favorites, was clear about his career path and never wavered from his ambition to join Real Madrid. As for Franck Ribery, he is understood to show a firm interest in playing for Liverpool. David Villa will only contemplate the overtures of Barcelona or Real Madrid, rather than the gloomy weather in Manchester.

    Manchester United’s next target is Aguero but he lacks pace, height and clinical finishing, yet is outrageously expensive. The deal will also require Berbatov to move in the opposite direction, and is a poor exchange even if the Bulgarian’s laziness and inability to convert crucial penalties earned the ire of United’s fans. Klaas-Jan Huntelaar, a key member of the current Dutch side, is unappreciated in Real Madrid but Manchester United have yet to table an attractive bid.

    But before we jump to the conclusion that Manchester United board has not tried hard enough or are using the money to pay off financial obligations, we have to understand that Spanish clubs traditionally enjoy an upper hand in the transfer market. Florentino Perez’s re-appointment as Real Madrid’s President further strengthened their appeal.

    Manchester United always come a distant second when competing on equal terms for established Latin players since the days of Gabriel Batistuta, Marcelo Salas, Patrick Kluivert, Ronaldo, and Ronaldinho. The arrival of Carlos Tevez is more of a fluke due to the intricacies of his contract, West Ham’s troubles, and the absence of major clubs’ interest.

    Under such circumstances, perhaps the fans should be thankful for the arrival of Antonio Valencia (a virtual unknown poorly rated), Michael Owen, and another French youth winger Gabriel Obertan who offers lot of promise, but don’t expect any of the three to make major contributions immediately.

    We can draw parallels for this dry period of talents to the 2006/07 season – when United sold Ruud van Nistelrooy to Real Madrid and only signed Michael Carrick from Tottenham Hotspur. Fortunately, Carrick managed to bolster a weakened midfield and has since matured into a player capable of holding the fort for the Red Devils.

    Of the three recent signings, I place greater faith in Michael Owen to measure up to expectations. Home grown finishers in the Premier League don’t come any better than Michael Owen. In May 1997, at the tender age of 17, he burst onto the scene and began an illustrious career of breaking goal scoring records.

    His electrifying pace, poacher’s instinct and goody two-shoes nature made him a hot football property, exactly the type of player who will sit well with Alex Ferguson. England also placed high hopes on Owen that they can finally terrorize opponents into submission.

    At Liverpool, Michael Owen forged a fearsome partnership with Robbie Fowler and in fact, hastened the departure of the moniker of God. Owen became Liverpool’s top scorer every season since 1998 until he left the club and had scored more than 150 goals. Despite England’s early exit from the World Cup, Owen was named the 1998 BBC Sports Personality of the Year.

    In 2001, Michael Owen’s late brace in the FA Cup final against Arsenal took the trophy to Anfield and he completed a treble of honours by winning the UEFA Cup Final against Deportivo Alaves. At the end of the year, Owen became the first English player in twenty years to win the European Footballer of the Year award.

    Unfortunately, Michael Owen’s bout of injury in 2003-2004 resulted in a bleak season for Liverpool. Gerard Houllier became the first victim, followed by Owen whose sale to Real Madrid for £8 million was approved by incoming manager Rafael Benitez. Despite being confined to the bench, Owen still ended the La Liga season with thirteen goals, and achieved the highest ratio of goals scored to number of minutes played.

    The downfall started when Newcastle United held out an olive branch to Michael Owen who wanted more match time to be in top form for World Cup 2006. The deal was sealed but Owen ended up spending more time in the treatment room than playing for the Magpies. It is fair to say that his injury stems from mismanagement and bad luck.

    The broken metatarsal in 2005, tearing of the anterior cruciate ligament in his knee in a short-lived World Cup 2006 that kept him out for a year and the hernia operation in 2007 effectively destroyed the aura surrounding Michael Owen. In all, he suffered injury or illnesses 16 times during his time at Newcastle and made only 58 Premier League starts.

    At Manchester United, I believe Michael Owen will receive better care to shake off his rustiness and get back to full fitness. Under the watchful eyes of Alex Ferguson, the signs from pre-season training are good that the player still retain his scoring touch, is working hard and enjoying his time at Old Trafford. After all, Owen has many friends in the United squad, thus integrating into the team is not a problem.

    I believe Alex Ferguson yearns for the return of a conventional striker. Last season, Manchester United have incredible firepower in Ronaldo, Berbatov, Tevez and Rooney, but they fail to outscore their closest competitors. Instead, United’s success was largely based on sound defending as they won games by the odd goal and embarked on a record breaking run of not conceding goal for 1212 minutes. Ferguson will certainly want the defensive discipline to continue but having another clinical striker to put away chances increases their title hopes.

    But from so many strikers, why did Alex Ferguson gamble on an injured player? For one thing, he appreciates the fact that rewards, if materialized, greatly outweigh the risks. A case in point is the purchase of Ruud van Nistelrooy. The deal was nearly axed when the Dutchman ruptured his cruciate knee ligaments during a training session. Nevertheless, Manchester United persevered and completed the transfer in 2001 by paying PSV an additional £500,000 for the player’s services.

    It turned out to be an excellent transaction as van Nistelrooy repaid the faith and money during his five years stint with 150 goals in 220 appearances as well as becoming the club’s all-time European scoring record with 38 goals.

    While Michael Owen may have lost the blistering pace in his youth, he is still among the most clinical strikers in England. If Owen can thrive during Houllier’s era which saw a Liverpool side engaging in a patient game of short passing and counter attack, then he should love the fluid, entertaining play by the Red Devils.

    Owen will certainly benefit from the dominant possession and chances created by Manchester United compared to the dis-spirited and incompetent players at Newcastle. Sometimes, the quality of service is so good, a striker need only be there physically to stick the ball into the net.

    Manchester United’s attacking style also reduces the need to depend on pace since most opponents are pinned back and have to defend in numbers. Thus, timing and positioning are more crucial factors to capitalize on crosses from the flanks as well as link up play from midfield. Eric Cantona, Teddy Sheringham and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer were among the influential strikers during Ferguson’s reign but each did not make their mark based on speed.

    In terms of commercial success, Michael Owen isn’t a glamor signing like David Beckham who sells merchandise by the truckloads. Fortunately, Alex Ferguson’s transfers stand in contrast to Real Madrid’s vision. He prefers hatchet men to deliver, and the United brand will take care of itself. Thus, he is more than happy to have Real Madrid take David Beckham off his hands, even in the face of huge commercial losses.

    Since Michael Owen is not going to start often, his value lies in being a veteran who has played at the highest level and rise often to the occasion. Owen can strengthen the bench for the big games, in the absence of Carlos Tevez.

    The Argentine may win hands down in terms of pace and technical skills like passing, dribbling and ball control, but Manchester United have saved themselves £22 million. In addition, Tevez’s impact is not as significant as Cristiano Ronaldo and can be rendered redundant by Rooney.

    Owen compensates for his one-dimensional game with a high conversion rate which stands proudly above Tevez, Torres, Berbataov and Rooney. Thus, little separates both players as they are expected to net 10-15 goals a season when coming off the bench.

    Michael Owen also serves another purpose of acting as a model to improve the prodigious talents of Danny Wellbeck and Federico Macheda. In recent years, Ferguson has shown a propensity for signing vintage players. Laurent Blanc, Teddy Sheringham and Henrik Larsson were regarded as past their best but their purpose was to impart experience and skills to the youngsters.

    Alex Ferguson has certainly come a long way from the impulsive ’90s when he wiped out old guards in one fell stroke and immediately blooding the youth team. However, competition has intensified tremendously and a team of hot-blooded youngsters may be a risky formula for success.

    Just look at Arsenal. Beautiful football is dished out by a bunch of youngsters who are not short on skills, stamina and eagerness but their inability to capitalize on chances and hold their ground when the going gets tough is a major stumbling block.

    Welbeck and Macheda will eventually step up but not after they have gained consistency and experience. Speaking of experience, some fans may prefer Samuel Eto’o or Thierry Henry. I agree they will be more beneficial for the youngsters but the price will not be cheap either. Since Alex Ferguson has been a long-time admirer of Owen and regards age as an asset rather than liability, this is a good time to pick up a distressed asset for pennies on the dollar.

    Overall, Michael Owen makes an ideal replacement for Ruud Van Nistelrooy, an out-and-out striker who put goals away at close quarters. Ferguson can toy with different options by either fielding Berbatov in the hole while pairing Owen and Rooney up front. Or Rooney can play in a withdrawn position, leaving Owen and Berbatov to lead the front line.

    But for every transfer success, there are also failures for Alex Ferguson. The United’s medical team cannot always perform miracles. Louis Saha and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer were laid out for long spells and could not last the rigors of a full season. Eventually, they moved on.

    I cannot say if Owen will be another Louis Saha or Ruud van Nistelrooy but since any player will need a few games to settle down in a new environment, and for someone who is low on confidence and fitness due to a myriad of injuries, it is fair to give Owen a longer time to hit top gear before judging him.

    However, assuming Owen rediscovers his form, there are flaws to his game that make Cristiano Ronaldo appear indispensable. Owen may be a natural finisher (with one foot) but he lacks creativity, nor is he capable of holding the ball up on his own or getting past defenders with trickery. He has to feed off other players and his limited game outside the box means you have to build the team around Owen.

    Despite these flaws in his game, I am more worried about Owen’s attitude and desire to win. Detractors of Cristiano Ronaldo may denigrate him as a flamboyant peacock and dirty diver, but nobody can deny that he demands an exacting standard of himself and possesses a burning desire to be the best footballer.

    Cristiano Ronaldo trains hard – polishing existing skills and experimenting with new tricks to become a more complete player. Alex Ferguson has revealed the secret to the magic which Ronaldo weaves on the pitch and the answer is alarmingly simple: tireless hours of practice.

    Does Michael Owen desire to win titles and improve himself? Or does he believe that an old dog cannot learn new tricks? Is he content to warm the bench or just go on the pitch and put in 90 minutes of insipid performance and then collect his wages at the end of the day? If he has this kind of attitude, no football club or manager can help him.

    During the final matches of survival for Newcastle, I was disappointed by the Geordies’ lack of heart and character and their nonchalance towards relegation. Great hopes and responsibilities were thrust on Michael Owen but he did not respond in a positive manner. Thus, it remains to be seen if Owen works hard all the way at Manchester United or only impress in the first few matches.

    As for Liverpool, they may be indignant but there is hardly any betrayal here. Michael Owen wanted to move back to Anfield on two occasions, giving them first priority and agreeing to take massive pay cuts but to no avail, probably because of injury concerns, transfer fees and more importantly, Benitez’s hesitation.

    By the way, Owen is not the first player to ply his trade for both clubs, thus the animosity should not get out of hand. Previously, there were Phil Chisnall and Paul Ince who was appointed Liverpool’s captain. Sir Matt Busby also played for Liverpool before going on to manage Manchester United, making them the first English club to win the European Cup.

    Nevertheless, Owen’s arrival at Old Trafford will deepen the rivalry which runs through both clubs from fans to boardroom. Such moves are frowned upon as can seen by Alex Ferguson’s refusal to allow Gabriel Heinze and Carlos Tevez to cross over to the enemy and similarly Steven Gerrard “just would not come.”

    Relations between United and Liverpool reached new lows last season with Benitez’s infamous rant about Ferguson. This transfer certainly adds spice to the rivalry and it will be fascinating to see Owen visit Anfield with United in the Premier League on October 24.

    Considering Michael Owen’s contributions for Liverpool, the fans should wish him all the best, even if he plays a significant part in a fourth consecutive Premier League title for Manchester United and their record 19th title. I hope the treatment will not be as belligerent as what we saw from the Catalans when Luis Figo switched from Barcelona to Real Madrid.

    Will Manchester United get over the loss of Cristiano Ronaldo? There are no shortage of punters backing Owen to be the top Premiership scorer next season and also making the World Cup squad next summer. We shall see, in a few months’ time. Stay tuned for updates.


    Breaking Down the Yankees for the Second Half – The Bullpen

    08asball Breaking Down the Yankees for the Second Half   The Bullpen

    All star baseball

    By Rebecca

    [So the All Star Game is officially over--and we can thus consider ourselves in the second half.

    This is where it gets fun.

    All of those days players got rested in the first half? Well, now they have to play. Now the pennant races start to heat up, and every move a team makes, be it a trade, a free agent signing or simply bringing someone up from AAA has even more added meaning.

    What do we expect from the Yankees?

    I'm going to do a series of posts addressing this, because there's so much to say that having it all in one post would a) kill your eyes and mine, and b) give me carpal tunnel at the age of 23.]

    Since this is the last post in the series, I’ll provide you with an index:

    The Rotation
    The Lineup, Part 1
    The Lineup, Part 2
    The Bench

    Now it’s on to the mother of all things Yankees:

    The Bullpen

    To do this post justice, one has to figure out who should be included, and who might be a little more expendable–since bullpens are fluid and change so much over the course of a season.

    In this instance I’m going to settle around the “core” of Mariano Rivera, Alfredo Aceves, Phil Coke, Phil Hughes, Brian Bruney, David Robertson and Brett Tomko–the guys that have been around (or should have been around) all season. Mark Melancon and Jonathan Albaladejo will get passing nods, but we’ll go ahead and pretend that Jose Veras and Edwar Ramirez were not utterly awful.

    As a whole, the bullpen struggled early–when most of the rotation did, as well–but the call-up of Alfredo Aceves seemed to work miracles. That one move allowed for the short relievers to remain short relievers, for Coke and Hughes to basically claim the eighth between them and for Robertson and Tomko not to be faced with undue pressure.

    When Aceves was moved from the bullpen for a spot start, we saw the ‘pen fall apart again–though, this time, fortunately, the All Star break came at exactly the right time.

    As long as Joba Chamberlain and Andy Pettitte are utterly ineffective, look for Aceves to remain in the bullpen.

    (The so-called bullpen core in alphabetical order)

    Alfredo Aceves

    The statistics will tell you that Alex Rodriguez, and not Alfredo Aceves is the more valuable of the two Yankees to make their first appearance this season in early May, but Aceves’ value lies in far more than just the numbers he’s posted.

    The easiest way to explain what Aceves has meant to the Yankees in 2009 out of the bullpen would be to say that Aceves is pitching in a role similar to that of Ramiro Mendoza, but his numbers out of the bullpen are actually closer to what Mariano Rivera posted in 1996.

    Since Aceves can pitch multiple innings at a time without getting worn down, the short relievers–especially guys like Phil Coke and David Robertson–do not have to pitch nearly as much as they otherwise would. This not only saves their arms from, uh, being Proctor’d, but helps keep them more effective over the long haul.

    Look for Aceves to remain in the bullpen for now–after the disaster in Anaheim, the Yankees probably don’t want to mess with the bullpen too much–but if Mitre, the presumed new fifth starter, bombs and the Yankees decide not to go after Halladay (or another, you know, more attainable starter), Aceves could end up the fifth starter.

    In which case we will all have to hold our breath in the second halves of games started by Chamberlain and Pettitte.

    Brian Bruney

    The season that, for Bruney, started with so much promise has quietly turned into a disaster. He’d earned himself the eighth inning role before going down on the DL with an elbow problem, worked his way back only to go back on it after just one appearance, and now seems to have lost the command that had been so important in the first place.

    In short, it’s the return of the 2007 version of Brian Bruney.

    The Yankees really want to get him right–if he can somehow recover his arm strength and command, the Yankees could consider, more seriously, the idea of sending Hughes down to AAA to stretch him out as a starter (although I explain here why I don’t think it would work), but even if Bruney did recover, the risk inherent in relying on a power pitcher who’s twice been on the DL in the same season with elbow problems is an enormous one.

    It’s a shame, really, because Bruney showed so much promise in 2008 before hurting his foot, and then again in early 2009.

    I don’t know what happened for Bruney to have such awful karma, but something apparently did.

    Going forward, Bruney will likely be used in low-leverage situations until his command improves, or he will be used in mop-up like roles after the starters (yet again) are inefficient. He’ll have to work his way back to the 8th and even then there is no guarantee.

    Phil Coke

    The battle between Good Coke and Bad Coke may be as addicting to watch as the battle between Good Melky and Bad Melky. Actually, the entire reason to want to see him pitch is to watch the postgame interviews afterward.

    Coke struggled in the beginning, found a groove, and then struggled again in his most recent appearance in Anaheim.

    On the whole, he’s been fairly dependable, but tends to give up too many hits–6 HR in 38 IP is not a portent for good things to come–so the Yankees are best served if he is used very sparingly, which, thanks to Aceves and Hughes, he now is.

    Should Dámaso Marte stop playing catch and start playing baseball, he could help ease some of Coke’s LOOGY duties, and provide some relief for the Yankees, who are playing with fire.

    Phil Hughes

    Probably the most controversial reliever, not because he’s pitched poorly, but because he probably should have never been in the bullpen in the first place.

    As a starter, Hughes wasn’t exactly dominating anywhere outside of Texas, but he was getting better, and showing improved consistency and efficiency. Considering that this is his first healthy season since all the way back in 2006, that’s not something to be taken lightly.

    As a reliever, Hughes has just dominated. You can see the splits here, but to sum:

    Hughes’ ERA is 0.98, his BAA is .115, OBPA is .182 and WHIP is 0.655.

    Hughes has only pitched 18.1 innings in relief, and his BABIP is an insane .147, so there’s certainly a case to be made that the law of averages will catch up to him, but with relievers much of the time, you only have a small sample size to use, so you ride the hot arm as long as it stays hot.

    If the Yankees have learned only one thing here, it’s that if Hughes, for whatever reason, loses his value as a starter next season, he still has plenty of value as a reliever.

    Look for him to keep the 8th inning role in the second half unless the Yankees have utterly no choice but to stretch him out again. If that happens, than the Yankees will probably have bigger issues than what they do about the eighth inning…

    Mariano Rivera

    He’s Mo. Really.

    He was getting hit more often in the beginning of the season, which had some worried, but this seems to have been a result of recovering from off-season shoulder surgery and perception, since what he did last season was simply historic.

    He’s back to his old Mo self now, notching his 500th save and 1st career ERA in the same game.

    In the second half, the Yankees probably won’t want anything more than for him to keep doing his thing. Wearing number 42, he is, after all, the answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything.

    David Robertson

    The easiest way to explain Robertson in this: when he throws strikes, he’s unhittable. When he doesn’t, he’s unwatchable.

    When Robertson comes into a game in low-leverage situations, he throws strikes.

    When Robertson comes into a game in high-leverage situations, he throws balls.

    You can see why this is a problem.

    In a mop-up type role, Robertson is fine for the bullpen, but the problem is that the Yankees play a lot more close games than they do blowouts, and they need relievers that can either protect a lead or keep another team’s lead within reach.

    Look for him to stick to low-leverage situations, and don’t be shocked if some combination of Chien Ming Wang getting healthy again and Sergio Mitre pitching well sends him back on the AAA bus–though likely not before Melancon or Albaladejo.

    Brett Tomko

    The problem with Tomko is that when he gets hit, he gets hit hard.

    Though a former starter, right now he can’t really pitch more than two innings at a time, and he’s seldom seen in anything other than a mop-up role or in an extra inning game when all other pitchers have been used.

    That said, I think he does get a bit of a bum rap–for what it’s worth, Coke has given up more home runs. Then again, Coke’s pitched 38 innings and Tomko’s only pitched 20…

    Although Tomko is a DFA candidate, it would seem more likely that Mark Melancon or Jonathan Albaladejo would be sent back down to Scranton before the Yankees parted ways with Tomko. We shall see.

    Mark Melancon and Jonathan Albaladejo

    Melancon, once hailed as the future Mo, was probably called up from AAA Scranton too soon. He’s struggled in AAA since being sent back down, and again since being called up. There’s too much talent to write him off, but he does need some more time.

    Albaladejo didn’t pitch well early and got sent down, has pitched lights out when recalled after Wang got hurt the second time, but then got sent back down…to make room for Melancon.

    If Girardi is riding the hot reliever, right now he should stick with Albaladejo.

    dude, if you made it this far, I kind of want to hug you…


    Mid-Season Sprint Cup Report

    By Bob Ellis – NASCAR Ranting and Raving

    Two-time NASCAR Sprint Cup Series champion Tony Stewart needed little time to grasp the driver-owner concept. At the season’s midpoint, he has already:

    • Won two races (Pocono and Daytona), becoming the first driver-owner to win a race since Ricky Rudd in 1998, and the first to win multiple races since Rudd in ’97;
    • Captured the points lead, the first driver-owner to do so since Alan Kulwicki in 1992;
    • Put both of his Stewart-Haas Racing cars in the top 12 in points.

    Stewart’s surprising success highlights a season filled with compelling storylines. Competition is strong and balanced, as illustrated by the 11 different race winners this season. There were 12 different winners in all of 2008, including seven drivers who have yet to win this season. In other words, last year’s mark will likely be passed.

    Some other statistics gleaned from the first half:

    • 7 different teams represented in the current NASCAR Sprint Cup top 12
    • 8 different Coors Light Pole winners
    • 34 drivers with at least one top-10 finish
    • 40 drivers have led at least one lap
    • Average Margin of Victory of 1.044 seconds
    • 10 races with an MOV under 1 second
    • Average of 11 leaders per race
    • Average of  20 lead changes per race
    • Average of 22 green flag passes for the lead all around the track
    • Average of 3,038 green flag passes per race
    • 52% of the cars finished on the lead lap
    • 85% of the cars were running at the finish
    • All four manufacturers have won a race and are in the top 12

    The above statistics are the reason for one of the most competitive, yet unpredictable seasons in recent memory:

    • There have been three first-time winners. Brad Keselowski, David Reutimann and Joey Logano all captured their first career NASCAR Sprint Cup Series victories. With his win at New Hampshire, Logano became the youngest winner in series history.
    • Mark Martin’s successful return to a full-time schedule has been one of the most intriguing stories thus far this season. His three victories tie him with Kyle Busch for the most in the series at the halfway point. Still, Martin is outside the Chase top-12 bubble, in 13th. He has eight more races to make a top-12 return.
    • In his third full season, Colombia-born Juan Pablo Montoya is looking more and more like a championship contender. With eight top 10s, he has already eclipsed his previous season-best total of six in 2008. Montoya currently sits 11th in the points, 86 points inside the Chase cut-off.
    • Four NASCAR Sprint Cup champions sit in the top-four in points, something that has never happened this deep into a season. Tony Stewart (2002 and ’05 champion), Jeff Gordon (1995, ’97, ’98, 2001), Jimmie Johnson (2006-08) and Kurt Busch (2004) rank in the top four.

    But 18 more races remain, including NASCAR’s “playoffs” – the Chase for the NASCAR Sprint Cup, which consists of the final 10 races of the season. A number of questions hang in the balance going into the second half:

    • Will Jimmie Johnson win an unprecedented fourth consecutive NASCAR Sprint Cup championship?
    • Who will be the top seed going into the Chase? Once the Chase starts, each driver in the top 12 will have his points reset to 5,000, with 10 additional bonus points added for each win during the first 26 races. Currently, Mark Martin and Kyle Busch lead the series in victories with three – and 30 potential bonus points.
    • Will Johnson and Matt Kenseth each make their sixth consecutive Chase? The two are the only drivers to earn a berth in every single Chase since its inception in 2004.
    • Will Carl Edwards pick up a win? Edwards has gone winless over the first 18 races since winning a series-high nine in 2008.
    • Will Richard Childress Racing have a second-half rebound? After putting three drivers in the Chase last season, all four of its teams are currently outside the top 12.

    Fantasy College Football’s Top Value Defenses

    By Vince Mullins

    Fantasy College Blitz

    The most common complaint about new owners playing fantasy college football revolves around the number of teams one must cover, but I think that the exact opposite is true.

    Call me a glass-half-full guy, but the opportunity to choose from 120 teams each week puts less pressure on you to nail down a starter at QB and at defense during your draft.

    Most NFL fantasy leagues support 12 owners to choose from 32 teams means that if each team were to pick 2 QB or D then 3/4 of the supply is drafted.

    If the same tactics apply to your college league, that leaves more the 3/4 of the nation available for you in the free agent pool. Even if you just play the Big Six conferences plus ND then a little less than 2/3 of the pool is still available.

    Today I will focus on “value” defenses that should not require an early draft pick nor more than a dollar if your auction. I hesitate to call them all sleepers since there are some strong programs here, but common themes here are a simple September schedule (so some big schools here), strong coaching staff, low team expectations and/or returning studs.

    In no particular order, my red dog blitz of defenses for Double-digit rounds of your draft…

    USF Bulls – a pathetic September slate finishes up in Florida State but has two FCS teams and a visit to Western Kentucky. No matter who you put in those uni’s that should be enough, but when you add in a great DB tradition and the return of George Silvie and a great freshman/JUCO class this could be the unleashing of hell. In October they do have to face Cincy and West virginia, but both are at home on a short week. I am bullish on the Bulls again, which of course means for the third season in a row that they will disappoint with a surprising loss (like Louisville last season).

    Clemson Tigers – a perennial underachieving team that cost another Bowden his job (one more to go) but it will be curious to see how they operate when few are watching. The early schedule is not easy (MTSU, @GT, BC, TCU) but I am willing to bank on the outrageously talented front seven led by tweener Ricky Sapp, 8 returning starters on D and new DC Kevin Steele coming in after an amazing two year run in Alabama. This was a Top 20 defense in the 2008 BlitzIndex, expect the same in 2009.

    North Carolina State Wolfpack – first off, this might be the value of the 2009 draft at any position – Wolfpack lead the nation with EIGHT HOME GAMES, including the first four with two FCS teams. Someone forgot to tell Willie Young he could have been a first day NFL Draft pick so he is back to lead a very good D-line under 3rd year HC Tom O’Brien. Nine returning starters back and the experience should help a unit that allowed more then 30 ppg last year. I wondered aloud last season if the ACC was better than it seemed because of all the parity causing lots of losses all around, time to see if that hypothesis is valid.

    Ohio Bobcats – My buddy Phil and I took a break from work and discussed which conference has the most head coaches with national titles. He was about to dismiss the MAC until I told him to wait a moment and think – he needed a hint to remember Frank Solich (Nebraska, 2001). Bobcats somehow avoid the usual September “rent-a-victim” road trips and the one very big school on the schedule is Tennessee whose offense likely remains putrid. No byes until November, all the main returners are back who scored 3 TDs and seven returning starters led by LB Noah Keller makes this an excellent value.

    Nebraska Cornhuskers – a return to prominence for the Blackshirts? I think so as Bo Pelini and his bro Carl the DC should get some early national press for their hot start. Check the FAU-Arkansas State – @Virginia Tech – Louisiana September schedule. Huskers only return 6 but the one-man demolition crew named Ndamukong Suh anchors the line. There are fewer “legacy” programs with more damaged brand names than Nebraska, so grab some corn late and keep your eyes open for free agent defenses to hedge Big 12 schedule.

    Rutgers Scarlet Knights – Phil Steele has the Big R facing the easiest schedule of the BCS conference teams. WIth the graduation of all the main players in an amazing offense will likely keep fantasy focus away from here, better for you as eight starters return on the other side of the ball. I mentioned in my Rutgers preview that I don’t care for the co-coordinator setup in Piscataway, but Howard, FIU and Texas Southern in the six weeks should lead to some big turnover numbers. See the preview also for my full schedule breakdown.

    San Diego State Aztecs - while the Mayans get all the cultural focus these days, remember the Aztecs if you really wanna shock your fantasy friends. Fantasyheads know that Ball State’s Head Coach Brady Hoke upgraded his zip code to coach here, but less known is that former New Mexico Head Coach Rocky Long is now running the defense and he has skills. Long blitzes every down and was quickly hired after getting fired in Albuquerque. My quick count is that there are only four good offenses on the tilt. This is the epitome of the “Sleeper” Defense.


    Baseball Shouldn’t Ignore Instant Replay’s Value

    By Rebecca Glass

    This Purist Bleeds Pinstripes

    The New York Yankess are 13-4 in their last seventeen games. On the surface, that’s pretty impressive–but if you ask anyone, the Yankees should be better.

    Some fans will tell you that the Yankees should be better than 13-4 because they are insatiable and anything less than a 162-0 season is a complete disaster.

    They’re loonies.

    Other fans, however, will tell you that the Yankees very well could be 15-2 if not for some shoddy umpiring.

    Now, while it’s certainly a stretch to say that one blown call in the beginning or middle of a game can directly cause one team to win or lose, it is not a stretch to say that blown calls at the wrong time can be devastating.

    Take, for example the 2007 one-game playoff for the Wild Card between Colorado and San Diego.

    The game, if you remember, was won in extra innings when Matt Holliday slid home. Later replays, however, showed that Holliday never actually touched home plate, and that he should have been called out.

    A blown call there cost San Diego the postseason.

    There is, of course, a way to limit the damage of blown calls: instant replay.

    crease190 Baseball Shouldnt Ignore Instant Replays Value

    1999 Stanley Cup Finals: Would replay have saved Buffalo?

    Every major sport uses it at crucial moments; football is probably where it’s most notable, and, in hockey, it was the difference in the 1999 Stanley Cup finals.

    Baseball, on the other hand, has only just now begun to use instant replay, and here only for home run calls.

    It’s a start, but it’s not nearly enough.

    Any Yankee fan can tell you well enough that games are decided far more often on the base path than via the long ball. If Dave Roberts is called out in 2004…

    In a number of recent games, blown calls, not just for the Yankees but for other teams as well, have come to light and with the use of replay by TV broadcasters, it becomes more and more frustrating for fans at the wrong end of the blown calls.

    I am not advocating replay for balls and strikes–that would be ridiculous and the human element would be totally lost–but I am advocating a more expanded use of replay.

    Close plays on the bases can either kill a rally or keep one going, and, at the very least, it is not fair to a pitcher, who may have, for all intents and purposes pitched himself out of an inning, to have to throw another six or seven pitches. Granted, it is the pitcher’s fault if he can’t work around a blown call, but the consequences can be quite the same as if a player in the field had made an error.

    I keep trying to think of arguments against it, and I can’t defend them.

    Is not the idea here to keep the game’s integrity up to snuff? Isn’t this why spitballs and excess pine tar are banned and there are drug tests and gambling is forbidden? So the integrity of the game is not ruined?

    Then why risk ruining it when the technology exists to correct calls?

    I understand that the umpires don’t want to lose their jobs, but isn’t that the case normally, where if you don’t do your job right, you lose it?

    Then there’s the question of the games then taking too long, but this is remedied with a situation a la the coach’s challenge in football: you’re only allowed a certain number of challenges, and if you get it wrong, you’re penalized.

    How could one be penalized? This is harder to answer. The one that makes the most sense, or seems to be most fitting, is that a manager that gets it wrong gets tossed. Fairly simple, no? At any rate that oughta set apart the managers willing to stand up for their players and those that are not.

    At any rate, it’s hard to argue against an expanded use of replay when so much is at stake.